View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
xo Site Admin

Joined: 09 Feb 2002 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles [comcast]
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gorunova

Joined: 10 Feb 2002 Posts: 318 Location: Burnaby, B.C., Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome to the wonderful world of wondering where the line is and whether or not you've already stepped over it.
Good article though. I can certainly see the ISPs' viewpoint about a small number of users generating a huge load, but they should be up front and concrete about usage limits. Their fierce competition is leading them to use underhanded and spineless tactics. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xo Site Admin

Joined: 09 Feb 2002 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles [comcast]
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, yeah, that last line "if you've got someone downloading 60 gigabytes a month and paying $29.95" pretty much sums me up. Except it's $39.95. And I don't believe for a second I'm costing them jack shit. Especially since a few paragraphs above, they say they are promising to double line speed and "even faster in future years".
-xo |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oblio

Joined: 20 Feb 2002 Posts: 106 Location: Detroix, MI
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got my comcast letter a few days ago.
I am a premium subscriber (that is, I give them 99$/month rather than the cheapo-account).
On average, I download 1-5GB a day, using most of my pipe for an average of 3 hours a day, with the remaining 21 hours being <1KBs average use.
I upload a few GB a month (though I USED to upload a ton), constant average upload of 15KBs 24x7.
So far, I have not changed my behavior much, except to stop pulling some things I already have (kodomo no omocha comes to mind), so we'll see what happens.
I'm not pleased.
The biggest suck of all of this is that I'm paying twice what I was before comcast came in, and I'm getting generally shittier service... and NOW they are telling me that 3 hours a day is too much to be using the internet.
I know this is a family board, but they can go fuck themselves. I'll be moving houses in 10-20 days, and am actively checking the broadband provider of each house that I look at. Unfortunately, around Ann Arbor, MI, there is not much competition. :( |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neuralblastoma

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 Posts: 109 Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
North America needs more competition.
More broadband companies means speed and price wars which will result in faster speeds and cheaper prices for everyone.
Then we could all enjoy the same kind of service Japan and South Korea get.
Yeah, I know it's unlikely, but this really makes me envious and gives me false hope:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/09/16/korea.broadband.ap/index.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zanson

Joined: 08 Jan 2003 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yet another reason I love my Speakeasy DSL =) =). Yes I pay $90 + taxes for 1.5M/768k dsl, but they ENCOURAGE people to run servers, don't bitch about any kind of bw usage, and they follow up pretty quickly on any tech support stuff, even called me a few days after my install date to make sure everything was working.
60gb a month? I do 40-50gb a week in ul/dl combined... Especially now that I use bt for a lot of stuff. Glad I didn't go with cable modem.
If you want nice dsl, and you can get Speakeasy in your area, I highly recomend it. Though unless you want a higher end connection they are pretty pricey.
If you want a real nice download pipe from dsl, a friend of mine just got some 1.5-6M (basically as fast as your distance from the POP will let you go)/384k dsl from SBC-Yahoo for $150/mo I think he said. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xo Site Admin

Joined: 09 Feb 2002 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles [comcast]
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zanson wrote: | Yet another reason I love my Speakeasy DSL |
One question I always have when I see an alternate carrier mentioned: do they provide an nntp server? Or is all the downloading you do from pay-per Usenet/non-Usenet?
I probably download 25-50 GB/month, but 90% or more is the local nntp. If a local nntp wasn't provided, I'd have to shell $40-$50 to Easynews alone, on top of the ISP charges.
Of course, I'd probably adjust my traffic profile if that were to come to pass.
-xo |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gorunova

Joined: 10 Feb 2002 Posts: 318 Location: Burnaby, B.C., Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I got slapped last year, it was by phone not mail. I later discovered they had sent me an e-mail the day before the phone call, but it was a seldom-checked account.
At the time I had been downloading 55GB and uploading 5GB per month - that's their figures, not mine, which means that's after UUencoding overhead and all that. I had been using that much for five months straight before they called. They asked be to cut back to 6GB down and 1GB up per month, but told me they probably wouldn't bother me again if I used twice those figures. I figure I've managed to stay around 15GB down (my numbers), and they haven't called again yet. They said it was mainly the uploading that bothered them.
As for the competition thing, at least you have a little in The America. Slightly higher up in Canada, the government grants local monopolies to the cable companies, so the only choice is cable, ADSL or dialup. When I first moved to Vancouver I got Rogers @home, which had shitty retention and completion but no cap and access to all their servers. When @home went home, Rogers improved the news service a little but restricted access to local servers and imposed a 3GB/3day hard cap. Not long after that, the monopolies were rearranged and Shaw Cable took over my account from Rogers. Since then the completion and connection have been really good but the retention is still only 3 days. There's no hard cap, just what they told me on the phone.
Could be better, but at least I can still download two or three eps per day. That's good enough except for when there's a flurry of good posts, and then I have to rely on EasyNews to smooth it out.
I note that Shaw has changed their advertising slogan from "unlimited access" or whatever it was before to "always on". They were getting a tongue-lashing for apparently trying to pass off continuous availability as unlimited downloading. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xo Site Admin

Joined: 09 Feb 2002 Posts: 466 Location: Los Angeles [comcast]
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gorunova wrote: | As for the competition thing, at least you have a little in The America. Slightly higher up in Canada, the government grants local monopolies to the cable companies, so the only choice is cable, ADSL or dialup |
Someone misled you - cable co.s are granted local monopolies here too. At least in the places I've lived.
Our choices are the same- 1 cable option, maybe a few but expensive (on a per-line-speed-unit basis) DSL options, or dialup.
I take that back - some places are offering radio or microwave but availability is limited and you have line-of-sight restrictions.
-xo |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oblio

Joined: 20 Feb 2002 Posts: 106 Location: Detroix, MI
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
xo wrote: |
I probably download 25-50 GB/month, but 90% or more is the local nntp. If a local nntp wasn't provided, I'd have to shell $40-$50 to Easynews alone, on top of the ISP charges.
Of course, I'd probably adjust my traffic profile if that were to come to pass.
|
Comcast doesn't have a local NNTP server in my area (though they give you a free giganews account (3G/month limit), so I buy newsfeeds, easynews, and newsguy.
Amusingly, The top of the network for comcast must be a pay-per-byte system, so I'm sure they are "paying" for their decision to get rid of local NNTP servers.
As far as DSL goes, I would have it regardless of price if it was available... I've been considering getting a residential T1, but thats just a little too much. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zanson

Joined: 08 Jan 2003 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xo wrote: | zanson wrote: | Yet another reason I love my Speakeasy DSL |
One question I always have when I see an alternate carrier mentioned: do they provide an nntp server? Or is all the downloading you do from pay-per Usenet/non-Usenet?
I probably download 25-50 GB/month, but 90% or more is the local nntp. If a local nntp wasn't provided, I'd have to shell $40-$50 to Easynews alone, on top of the ISP charges.
Of course, I'd probably adjust my traffic profile if that were to come to pass.
-xo |
That is the only bad thing, you get a 1gb a month ng account from them, I think its giganews. So I pay $14 a month for a usenetserver.com account. Unlimited downloads, 3-4 day retention. Which is about the same or beter then any isp's new servers I know of, and the 1gb a month is nice for fills. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Keikai

Joined: 18 Feb 2002 Posts: 178 Location: Miami, FL
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I switched to Speakeasy back when DirectTVDSL (originally the great Telocity) closed shop. They generally cost more, but they lobby for users rights and will try to be the last to make changes like this. For example, I pay $60/mth for a measly 1.5/128k. Often when you read articles about user privacy you'll hear a Speakeasy spokesman being the one voice in favor of privacy against many of the big telcos.
Their news is provided by supernews, so it's excellent, with the obvious limitation that zanson mentioned. It's only useful to me for fills and I have to keep my newsguy and newscene accounts.
They aren't perfect, but they are more on the users side than anyone else. And they are nationwide here in the US. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oblio

Joined: 20 Feb 2002 Posts: 106 Location: Detroix, MI
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Keikai wrote: | They aren't perfect, but they are more on the users side than anyone else. And they are nationwide here in the US. |
Frankly, that is worth a lot of $/month to me.
I wish I could get DSL where I am. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jiss

Joined: 19 Feb 2002 Posts: 36 Location: Somewhere cold
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You know, I really feel guilty whenever this topic comes up. I spent a good part of the last couple of years moaning about my cable service and lack of competitors but nowadays there is both cable and DSL in my area and my cable is a 2Mb down (only 256K (I think) up mind). I pay UKP55 which is about US$91, but the UK is generally expensive anyway. My ISP seems not to care what I do. I easily download around 6-8 Gb/day (well did until my DVD Burner broke).
Mind, this is all still relatively new (cable has only been here around two years and above 512K for only the last year). We also have a lot of ISP's putting restrictions on 24/7 dial-up accounts now so I guess broadband will eventually turn for the worse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Orqyman

Joined: 27 Feb 2002 Posts: 98 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I too am in hating Comcast. That is why I stick DSL to Dallas in.
Go Canes! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|